Wonder if anybody inside the FDA sips green tea?

Did anybody connect the fact the FDA says it hasn't sufficient resources to rule on the safety and effectiveness of a chromium supplement, but certainly had the time and resources to review green tea and issue a bulletin telling consumers it's a worthless supplement. Wonder if anybody inside the FDA sips green tea? Related news stories belowGreen tea's anti-cancer effects 'highly unlikely', says FDA04/07/2005- Drinking green tea is highly unlikely to help prevent breast, prostate or any other type of cancer, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said last week, after reviewing the evidence to support a health claim, reports Dominique Patton. The statement, published on FDA’s website last Thursday, could surprise the increasing number of consumers, both in the US and Europe, buying green tea for its widely reported health benefits. A number of studies in recent years have revealed that compounds in green tea slow growth of cancer cells in the lab, while epidemiological studies have shown an association between green tea drinking and lower risk of breast and prostate cancer.Reports on these studies are thought to be responsible for the increased consumer interest in the traditionally Asian beverage.Recent research from Zenith found that consumption of green tea products in the UK had increased 87 per cent between 2000 and 2003, contrasting sharply with the downward trend in hot drink consumption across Europe."The health issue is probably the most important factor behind this growth,” Zenith analyst Anya Bourke told NutraIngredients.com.Much of the science on green tea has focused on its potential to help prevent cancer but last week the FDA said there was little science to support this link."Two studies do not show that drinking green tea reduces the risk of breast cancer in women, but one weaker, more limited study suggests that drinking green tea may reduce this risk," said the statement."Based on these studies, FDA concludes that it is highly unlikely that green tea reduces the risk of breast cancer." Likewise, only one "weak and limited" study shows that drinking green tea can reduce the risk of prostate cancer, the FDA said, and existing evidence does not support qualified health claims for green tea consumption and a reduced risk of any other type of cancer.However the FDA did not comment on green tea extracts nor purified epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), an antioxidant found in the tea that is often studied for its anti-cancer effects in the lab.The scientist who submitted a request with the FDA for a green tea health claim noted that the studies assessed by the authority may not have had access to populations consuming sufficient amounts of the beverage. Dr Sin Hang Lee, who markets a green tea health drink through his company Fleminger, claims a qualified health claim should be based on a National Cancer Institute (NCI) recommendation on the amount to be studied in anti-cancer research - daily consumption of 40 ounces of typical green tea containing 710(mu)g/mL of the antioxidant compound epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). The NCI standard, published in 1996, is based on the traditional green tea drink consumed by the residents living near tea plantations in China and Japan, said Dr Lee.The "lack of ready access likely prevented the studies from utilizing the standard recommended by both the NCI and our efforts for evaluating health benefits of green tea", he said.Most producers in Europe market the antioxidant potential of the beverage as there is currently no health claims legislation permitting disease risk reduction claims. Associated PressNutrition 21 Claims Delayed by FDA Again 06.21.2005, 10:55 AMNutritional supplement maker Nutrition 21 Inc. said Tuesday that it agreed to another 60-day extension for the Food and Drug Administration to review qualified health claims for chromium picolinate.The delay will not affect the company's marketing of its supplement products that contain chromium picolinate. The company said that its petition for a health claim is backed by more than 50 scientific studies. In April, the FDA requested a 60-day extension, pushing the agency's decision date to June 17. The agency is looking over Nutrition 21's claims that chromium picolinate reduces the risk of insulin resistance in Type 2 diabetes. Chromium picolinate is one of the ingredients of the company's Diachrome nutritional supplement.Nutrition 21 said that other nutritional health claims for supplements before the FDA are experiencing similar delays. Health claims are not drug claims in that they do not claim to treat a disease but provide information how a dietary change can help reduce risk for diet-related diseases. These statements can be used on product labels and packages."Fortunately, our current advertising and product label claims have performed well in consumer market research and our product distribution will not be limited in any way," said Gail Montgomery, president and chief executive, in a statement. "Independent of our effort to secure qualified health claims, we will continue to execute our marketing plans to accelerate consumer demand for our chromium picolinate products."Nutrition 21 shares fell 3 cents, or 3.6 percent, to 76 cents in morning trading on the Nasdaq. more...

http://www.herbsandnaturalremedies.com
Originally Posted on 7/20/2005 7:05:29 PMContent source: http://www.knowledgeofhealth.com/blog/2005/07/wonder-if-anybody-inside-f_112050109702296405.html